MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus STATE
Appreciating the evidence of Sections 9 (b) and 9 (c), a shortage of police arrested the suspect in the bazaar and recovered "marijuana" from his personal search, during the investigation of the aforementioned registered case. The suspect later revealed. Recovery of nine kilos of opium and a KG hash from his residential home, which he had taken into custody and a separate case has been registered. There was no unlawful will or prior hostility of the police to engage the police officers in falsely accusing the ordinary witnesses. People cannot be charged with such large quantities of drugs by police officers. It was alleged that the first culprit was guilty and the drugs recovered were less dangerous. The defendant's sentence was upheld, but his 14-year sentence was up to 8 years. Conditions \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Goular Khel lawyer
