Find a Lawyer

AGRICULTURAL ENGINEER versus MUHAMMAD BUX

Salary Payment Act 1936 Section 2 (vi) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 38 (3A) Notification FDLL (15) Express V111 / 76, Date 21 2 1978 and Notification Date 8 8 1978 Wages It is paid that the workers of the Work Charge Establishment were allowed to make some concessions but the workers were never paid. The copy of the notification dated 8.8 1978 under the Payment of Wages Act to the Authority by the applicants. 21 2 The submission of the notification, which was canceled since 1978, was presented to the appellate court. This question is not a simple question of law, but a law and facts. This includes a mixed question that was not presented by any of the parties to the evidence and no affidavit was filed before the Appellate Court, which has certified copies. The original documents of the document or its original Gazette notification were not submitted, just plain copy cannot be considered as a government document whose judicial notice can take judicial notice. The Authority has only verbally claimed that the laborers under the relevant notification. Was not paid to, the appellate tribunal denied the circumstances in the intervention when you need a advocate from Lahore lawyer