Find a Lawyer

MAZHAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Sections 2302 (b) / & 34 & 2 302 (c) / evidence 34 Definition of evidence Grave and sudden outrage conviction, incident reduction was an eyewitness in which three persons died inside the house of the perpetrators. Had died. Neither was present on the relevant occasion nor has it been observed that the prosecution introduced a false version of the murder before the investigating agency and at the same time the prosecution had not ruled out the case. This field, which had to be fully acknowledged without any scrutiny and analysis, was also supported by prosecution evidence, such as the bodies of the deceased found in the compromised state lying on a bed. And they had knights. A nearby liar allegedly said that he had lost control of himself after seeing his unmarried 20-year-old sister in a position to compromise with the crowd. The third victim's own mother-in-law's band had invited themselves into trouble when they tried unsuccessfully to save the life of their immoral son, thus the death of the third victim would not fall under section 302 (b), and The accused was acquitted of the charge. In their statement under Section 342, CRPC, the three persons were killed and they were convicted under Section 302 (c), the PPC awarded the accused by the trial court in the specific circumstances of the sentence. Was not consistent. In the trial, the accused had no option but to reduce the sentence of 20 years RI to five years RI for killing the accused persons under grave and sudden provocation, under which the benefits of Section 382B. Simultaneous running range with female advocates from Pindi bhohri lawyer