Find a Lawyer

MESSRS PFIZER LABORATORIES LTD. versus ABDUL BARI

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 53 (1A) and 15 National Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) The National Industrial Relations Commission and the Labor Court demanding simultaneous proceedings of corruption The dismissal of the charge and the refusal of the charge sheet before the Labor Court for rehabilitation under section 25A resulted in the dismissal order being challenged before the National Industrial Relations Commission because of Section 3A (1A). Under section 15 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance Dispute read that despite the restoration prayer was prayed not to proceed before the commission The Commission was empowered to approve it under section 32 (1) and thus the petition could not be retained under section 25A before the Labor Court, which was stopped: (i) self-relief by the court. And (ii) the application of missions and complaints before the Labor Court under section 53 (1A) before the National Industrial Relations Act is two separate and separate proceedings, and the NIRC (Regulations and Duties) The Regulations 32 may not act in this process like a restriction against the Reggale 32 complaint application. criminal advocate from Zahir Pir lawyer