MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus FAZAL WAHAB
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 25A, 36 and 38 (3) of the Complaint filed by the applicant claiming the job to be a false employee, stating that the job was temporary for the particular job which stated That the services are bound to be terminated upon completion of the job and that after the submission the applicants rejected their thumb impression on appointment and closing letters and received their due on payment vouchers, applicants' handwriting. Without approving the request from the expert Labor Court to confirm the applicant's thumb Appeal Tribunal Held: Appeal Tribunal Held: In the circumstances, the Labor Court was obliged to apply for an employer before the final order was passed on the complaint request, the Labor Court put aside the order in the appeal. went
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Upper Dir lawyer
