Find a Lawyer

NAFEESUL HUSSAN SIDDIQUI versus MESSRS SHAHEEN AIRPORT SERVICES

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 2 (i) and Section O12 (3) (5) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A & 38 (3) Worker to determine The factor is whether the employee is the type of employee who has the duties of his duties and is not paid well enough that the ramp coordinator for the airport services establishment receives 3,000 rupees mainly for the duties of the ramp machines. Was not denied by any evidence like other workers. Other workers are job specialists and, admittedly, are acting like team captains, only mentioning that they are acting like team captains. Most experienced and skilled, such employees In the absence of any evidence, it cannot be treated as a workman to prove these duties. There was evidence of administrative and supervisory nature, indicating that its duties were manual in nature and not related to any of the important tasks of management and oversight. Ivory Nature's termination of such employee's services, either without specific reasons or without investigation and defense opportunity, does not violate Sections O12 (3) and (5) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968. Will be. But contrary to the principles of the Order of the Elimination of Natural Justice by the Appellate Tribunal, the restoration was honored with full benefits. us immigration advocates from Kazi Ahmed lawyer