Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 365B and 34 of abduction, abduction or forcing a woman to marry, etc. The common intention, refusal of bail, occurred at the complainant's home, which the complainant complained of Survivors did. The presence of all the relatives available in the house cannot be taken into consideration at the bail-out stage, as would be the case with a deep appreciation, which was not lawful, for both the accused to commit the particular crime. Was nominated for Under section 497 (1), the prohibited clause of the CCPC, abduction is punishable by life imprisonment, with respect to arbitrary relief in bailing the accused in such cases, only to extradite their case in extraordinary circumstances. Given the scope of the inquiry, which could be considered appropriate, no one available in their favor was able to identify, in the absence of any strong motive, an attempt to falsely implicate the accused. Will In the case of a temporary assessment of the material available on record, the accused cannot claim bail because the accused was fully involved in the alleged abduction case in his statement under Section 164, CRPC. ? It initially supported the prosecution case, which was adequately explained by the delay in filing a complaint, even otherwise, considering the delay in approving the bail for the accused involved in the death penalty. Could not be done The alleged abductor allegedly entered a non-existent circle at the time of transfer of the first bail application.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014
