WARIS MASIH versus STATE
Sections 302 (b), 305 and 310 of the Criminal Code (V9 1898), section 345 (2) During the approval of the Appeal of Evidence Appeal, the application sought permission from the court regarding the agreement between the legal heirs. The accused and the accused and the legal heirs were Christians according to religion and crime under Section 230 under. PPC was authorized with judicial permission. The report, presented by the trial court, shows that there was a compromise between the parties. And was freed who had arrived voluntarily through the parties and it was also confirmed that the only surviving legal heir of the report of a widow and a minor child, also showed that the deceased's widow Forgive the rights of the accused and the accused against the accused and obtained the original defense. Money-saving certificate from a minor son's widow in the form of a ditty acquisition, even by the minor child's remission of the accused, without arresting the legal heirs without fear and acquittal of the accused There was no objection, the agreement between the parties would not only pave the way for the friendly lifestyle / accommodation of the parties, but it would also promote peace and harmony in the area. The appeal of the accused in the compromise was allowed. Court rejects wrong verdict, set aside and the accused acquitted and released from jail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Sibi lawyer