Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYUB versus STATE

Section 302 The definition of evidence, the reduction of sentence was the only person whose name was listed in the FIR and its role was stated in which the injuries sustained by the gun were found on the deceased person. The facts of the case strongly supported the statements of Waj Tucker blood witnesses. The stained land was protected from the room, which, when the victim was injured, was said to have been sent to the Office of the Chemical Examiner and Serologist, who stated that the ground was contaminated with human blood, in connection with the witnesses action. The presence of a peace committee juror who came to his aunt's house said that the witnesses in the house were also natural and their names were immediately registered within an hour and a half of the alleged incident with the Investigation Officer. As I mentioned, the presence of Wajitkar's witnesses cannot be disagreed with, in the circumstances, his The statements were in accordance with the contents of the FIR and they supported each other and even though both of these witnesses fulfilled all the requirements of the natural witness and their evidence was above the intrinsic value of the evidence, the prosecution conceded. Immediately after the murder of the accused, he was found guilty of murder. The mitigating circumstances were not known, but there was one case on which the accused could not be convicted of the death sentence, the death sentence under the trial was reduced to life imprisonment, But the amount of compensation was retained. Section 382B also gave the benefit of CR PC female advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer