Find a Lawyer

SAIFULLAH SHAH versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER

In the Article 199 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 6506 / Constitutional Constitutional Petition sought to terminate the FIR applicants / accused on the basis that they filed an FIR against them. Had committed no convictions and criminal proceedings were carried out against them. Misuse of the law process, but also the result of civil litigation between the parties and that the applicants were equipped with evidence of their innocence, but not by their investigating officer's unreasonable exercise of power. Not being entertained. The controversial fact-based dispute was relaxed, the required determination was made through detailed investigation / recording of the evidence, but such exercise could not be done by the High Court, while the inquiry officer's powers were under Article 199 of the Constitution. Excluding authority, was determined by a framework under the law under which he was operating. It was unthinkable that the Investigation Officer would, in the discretionary exercise of his powers, violate the prescribed limits, refusing to record the material in evidence of the applicant's innocence, which would have led him to apply. Was provided by law to provide entertainment to. The disclosure of his innocence before his investigating officer was brought on record to all relevant Material Investigation Officers High The High Court had directed that the applicants should record the statements and maintain the entire evidence of their innocence and Consider this before preparing your report under section 1773, CR PC. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n advocate for immigration from Khair Pur Mir lawyer