MANZOOR HUSSAIN versus SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE
Section 164 of the Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Articles 420, 468 and 471 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Recording of the second statement The applicant was voluntarily and freely denying his request in which the application There was no suspected accused. The original FIR, but after refusing to become a prosecution witness, he said he was included in the case as an accused and had made serious allegations that readers had left his signature / thumb impression empty. After getting it on paper. With the investigating officer, when the magistrate was not even sitting in court, the law does not record or explicitly prohibit the recording of another statement under section 164, the constitutional application of the PCP was allowed and the applicant made his second statement in section 164. Under CR, the CRPC will voluntarily confirm the applicant's statement / credibility of two conflicting statements, to be considered by the trial court during the trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Bhirya Road lawyer