Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHABBIR SIDDIQUE versus STATE

Further inquiries are required for the grant of further inquiries of Sections 497 (2) and 498 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 342, 365, 395, 148 and 149, Section 365 in the case of the accused. At the time of the alleged incident, the accused was sitting in his car with the complainant consenting. If, after that, the victim was forcibly detained against his wishes, then in most of the provisions of section 342, the PPC would be enforceable, which was a guaranteed offense, the Medico legal certificate showed the doctor. That the complainant / victim inspected, did not see any signs of torture on the affected person who further negated the complainant's version, request for the provisions of section 95 95 of, further investigation to PPC. Is needed because the accused and the complainant were friends and complainants with his consent with the accused and then the matter was settled due to a dispute. The prosecuting officer went on to say that as far as the subjects were concerned to snatch, the accused party offered the complainant an oath on his innocence, but the complainant offered the pre-arrest warrant rule Refused to accept, although the post-arrest warrant was different, but if the post-arrest case / bail was dismissed, the defendant dismissed his bail plea for pre-arrest bail a few days behind bars. It would be funny to send r \ nIn the circumstances, the defendant's bail was already approved before arrest, confirmed r \ n when you need a advocate from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer