Find a Lawyer

SIKANDAR versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/109/34 bail, grant no further act was granted to the accused for further investigation; Was involved. The allegations of inciting his co-accused, to clear the dead FIR, revealed that at the time of filing the same case, no evidence related to the commission of the aggravated offense was cited, however, after the trial was registered , The complainant filed a supplemental statement in which he claimed that the prosecutor's witnesses contacted him on the day of the incident and narrated the story of the provocation, allegedly speaking temporarily to his co-accused. Because of this, it is not appealed that a person be so open-minded to his fellow accused. And in the presence of a close relative of the person, intended to be erased, a further investigation into the allegations made by the complainant was presented after the accused in favor of the accused, extracting a case from further investigation, Bail cannot be denied simply because his partner was out of law, the accused cannot be punished for the inability of the police to fail to fulfill his duty to arrest the main accused. Was. The accused could not be held hostage for the arrest of his co-accused because he had also thrown the net wide for the accused, whose real son was involved in the case as a co-accused. Could not be done Was involved in some other cases, but nothing was kept on record in support of the charge, when the accused was involved in any case. family advocate from Layyah lawyer