Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus STATE

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 392 Interim Pre-arrest Bail, a complaint has been filed against the accused on the complaint of the complainant confirming that the accused had taken away the leased vehicle which was re-issued by him. And also that they lost the complainant for Rs 10,000 and the cellphone accused admitted that there was a heated dispute between the lease and the bank for touching the terms and conditions of the purchase agreement. That they resolved in earnest. The accused also claimed that under the law, it was not permissible for the complainant to authorize that the person leasing the vehicle leased to any person on any land was in possession of the accused when the complaint was made. The default was to repay or reproduce the defaults on payment of the installment installments. Before the legal forum Manis Rica, which was the essence of every crime, was missing, the matter was lost. The bank's complaint against Ruff Consumer was that he failed to pay the installments on a due date. There was no criminal act or offense. The customer had a civil liability on the outstanding installments of the leased vehicle, the defendants established their dignity by paying the dues and the bank had already issued a clearance certificate for the complainant that the accused had a mobile phone and 10 000 was also taken away. In the FIR, the accused is accused of snatching a mobile phone and snatching Rs 10,000 from the complainant. famous lower court advocate from Mailsi lawyer