Find a Lawyer

RABIA TALIB versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN

RR 2 (ii) and 4 Constitution of Pakistan 1973), Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional Application Discrimination Lecture attendance received on the basis of self finance on admission to self-finance students and they were not allowed due to lack of lectures. Applicants The plea taken by the applicants was that their lectures should be counted from the day they entered the university and not on the date when the semester started, the petitioner submitted that Authorities have also eliminated shortages in some other students' lectures, so they were discriminated against because of their enrollment history. It was now necessary to book, not from the beginning of the semester, the competent authority had exercised discretion in favor of two other students in an arbitrary and arbitrary manner, violating the rules of the applicants on a better basis. Had to hold on to. The other two students, were not treated equally and were made clear that they did not adopt the same policy while discriminating with the competent authority and they refused to waive their attendance and treated the applicants as discriminatory. And under the principle of equality, the applicants were also entitled to the same treatment that was outlined. According to the circumstances, requests from his classmates were allowed best law firm from Kunri lawyer