Find a Lawyer

REHMAN ULLAH versus STATE

Appellant / Appellant took a different stand in his statement against Section 417 (2A) Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34, and did not state the story stated in his complaint. Had said that after the complaint was recorded. Illegal delay, but no explanation was given by the appellant about the delay. The trial court rightly felt that the version cited by the appellant / complainant was after misunderstanding and that the story is likely to be introduced to include the defendant / accused. In any case, even though the appellant's presence on the occasion claiming to be an eyewitness was suspected because of the strained relationship between him and the defendant / accused whom he had confessed in his complaint, Medical evidence cannot be prosecuted; if other evidence was not available to link the accused with the commission of the crime of suicide, the evidence was proved by the evidence, and there was no reason to interfere with the appeal. Not because interference with appeals against evil was an unusual phenomenon and it can only be. If justice-related abortion is to be committed, then the accusation of a double innocence after being acquitted of the charge was associated with an accused. The mere fact that the accused cannot be interfered with by the High Court because by re-examining the evidence, another theory can form. power of attorney advocate Khushab lawyer