Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ABBAS versus STATE

The matter of appreciation of the provisions of Sections 302 (6), 148 and 149 has been dealt with by the complainant in the FIR and, contrary to the testimony of the prosecution in their statement under Section 161, CR PC, they have been disputed. There was a contradiction, while a copy of the Holy Prophet was kept. They had the Qur'an in their hands and they made further statements during a probe before a section P; there were such major contradictions earlier and statements from eyewitnesses regarding the same incident, in fact. Were enough to remove it. The prosecution's version of these witnesses was that the accused did not cause any injury to the deceased, while, according to the accused's statement under Section 342, CR PC, he was the only one who fired during the exercise of his right. The victim was injured and killed. The private defense record had established that the incident by the accused could be corrected, and that the incident that took place in this case was not born again. Made any kind of advance, but at that time the situation of the land had deteriorated and he had himself taken an ugly turn in which the FIR itself had shown that it was the complaining party, in which Including the deceased who went to the place where the accused party was already peacefully present. ; It was clear, in the circumstances, that it was not the accusatory party that had attacked the complaining party prematurely and concrete; the prosecution's witnesses had failed to fully state that the accused was in the meantime. One person had a fireworks injury on him. The doctor confirmed that he had performed a medical examination that allegedly appeared advocate from Hangu lawyer