QAMAR DIN versus STATE
Section 9 (c) / 15 Testimonies of Evidence and the Story of the Hen The fake recovery of heroin in the drug market for millions of possessions could not possibly be leveled against the accused policemen, who were natural and independent witnesses. Identification provided evidence of heroin recovery from suspects beyond the shadow of a doubt. The allegations were responsible for the entire intoxicating substance recovered from his personal possession, as well as from his constructive possession vehicle claiming that the accused was merely a chemical auditor for the amount of heroin sent to him for analysis. Could be responsible for, there was no coercive punishment and in the circumstances the punishment of the accused was maintained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Pasroor lawyer
