Find a Lawyer

TEHSEEN MAZHAR versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF PUNJAB, LAHORE

Sections 4 (6) (a) (d), 15, 22 (v) and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of Educational Institutions of course examination Examination for Board of Studies effect `Shafqat ate and` Grace \ Marks Distraction The candidates alleged that the exam was not finished at all and at the time of the examination, the officials had promised to give the compensation numbers but were not given such numbers. The candidates further alleged that despite the advice of the Board of Studies, The Vice-Chancellor did not comply. The Board's advice and refusal to provide compensation marks were only authorized by the Vice-Chancellor to return the matter to the Board of Studies for reconsideration, if he was not satisfied with the recommendations. Went on to completely ignore the advice and put into practice the recommendations that were rejected, so he acted beyond his authority, and he needed to teach the students for no reason. A. And the syllabus that were suggested if the students were given exams beyond the prescribed courses, University of Punjab Under the 1973 Act, university authorities failed to perform their duties, requiring respect and adherence to the recommendations made by the Vice-Chancellor by the Board of Studies. He had no integrity in passing such advice. Sympathy and grace were two separate things. Grace Marks was always given to an individual while a group of people were given signs of compassion. Was granted \ r \ n ask a advocate free from Feroz Walla lawyer