RAJA MUHAMMAD SHIRAZ versus BANK MANAGER, SME BANK LTD., RECOVERY OFFICER
Article 199 Recovery of money borrowed from the Constitution Petitioner was sent to jail in a civil jail where he remained for about 40 days, as per the law, the applicant was not charged for such a default offense. The maximum punishment could have been. The bank petitioner's responsibility to be the father of the borrower in the 40-day jail case has already been laid on the shoulder, but he cannot be further convicted or harassed even if the applicant was a guarantor. So, in the actual presence, the borrower should not have taken full responsibility on his shoulders as he was the father of the borrower. The High Court directed that the applicant should not be disturbed further by the bank, however. This will not mean that the bank cannot receive money from the central borrower. Assist by notifying the central borrower's address and its whereabouts
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
