Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus EHSAN ALI

Section 7 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Rule 302/324/109/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 439 requested for the commission to be set at the time of release at a pending stage of the FIR. After a gap of one year and two months from the date of the registration of the case, which raised doubts about its authenticity and could not be fully acknowledged, it was genuinely accepted, during the investigation by the police. No such request was made by the accused before the accused. The trial court, no doubt, sought the original record of birth certificate and school leave certificate, but it failed to examine the record holder and other facts, the trial court gave birth Certificates and leaving school were very important. The certificate completely ignored the opinion of two medical board complainants, in which the defendant seriously questioned the two certificates presented in support of this minority claim, but the trial court changed the medical board's opinion. Based on the above documents only, questions about the age of the accused were determined. It is argued that in the presence of an authentic birth certificate, the accused did not have a school leaving certificate. The strength of the impression was that a picture test could be ordered because the last resort was incorrect and was sensitive to viable documents such as birth certificates or school leaving certificates, dispersal and manipulation, etc., and to adopt safe courses. It was imperative for the trial court to determine the allegations in order to get the opinion of the medical experts. list of advocates from Orakzai lawyer