J.D. W. SUGAR MILLS LTD. THROUGH EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, FINANCE versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE
Appeals Tribunals Sections 46, 47 and 48 of the High Court's restoration notice found that appeal against the recovery notice was not sustained in the appeal before the High Court scope tribunal challenging it before the tribunal. The appeal was also not appealed. The notice of recovery was neither eligible nor the tribunal dismissed the appeal and affirmed its order before the High Court under section 47 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990. After the recording of this order, the demand against the inquiry was established. And the issuance of a Notice of Receipt was certainly a continuation of the order, in fact being an order, the Recovery Notice was merely an act of further enrichment, which did not maintain an appeal against the Recovery Notice. Was not open to challenge before the Tribunal Order of the Tribunal, and was granted due consideration by H. The High Court under Section 47 of the Sale Tax Act has not created any questions about the 1990 High Court dismissed the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
