Find a Lawyer

ALM TRADERS THROUGH MANAGER versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, COLLECTORATE

Sections 18, 25, 27 and 32 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application to make false statements about imported goods Old and used computer systems, parts and accessories were imported, the price was announced and it was declared According to the first provision submitted for examination of the fist, the applicant offered to pay the duty under sections 18 and 27 of the Customs Act 1969, however, his application was ignored and for breach of it. The report against it stated that the GD Validity Department had initiated the direct action which was taken under Section 32 Customs of the applicant. The provisions of the Z Act, 1969 should have been initiated at another stage after the determination of the criminal intent, when circumstances would prove that the importer was deliberately hiding his import facts and his RD Itemized Details for Proper Assessment In the present case, it was offered by the applicant that he was unaware of the full details, ready for proper assessment of the goods and to pay the tax. Is also ready, said the offer was considered as an act The applicant had requested to hide the price of the goods that the ordinary present I requested a minor assessment, which the Department was trying to consider unfounded, as well as the High Court's constitutional petition allowing reporting of violations of the GD, set aside and the customs authorities He was directed to review the price under section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969 advocate from Kamra lawyer