FAZAL ILLAHI & SONS THROUGH REGISTRAR versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS
Article 25 and 81 Customs Rules, 2001, R109 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Determining the customs value of provisional goods and temporary assessment duty was issued by the applicants / importer under the provisional assessment. Under which, under the declared value of imported goods besides payment, under section 81 of the Customs Act, 1969, the authorities received a post-dated check and compensation bond from the importer for the difference in liabilities due to high cost of imported goods. What, it is claimed by the authority. The provisional valuation based on the high cost claimed by the administration was finalized on the import failure of importation of section 25 (4) of the Customs Act, 1969, thereby imposing duty on the taxing officer. They can ask for documents or they can ask for documents. There was no demand from the importer by the provisions of R 109 of the Customs Rules 2001 that the importer, which required mutual assistance or clarification, had no demand from the importer that the claimant had to prove the high cost by the authority. The importer was not exposed to any material to be punished in the absence of a default imposed by the authority. The importer's order to show the authority's demand for evidence and consequently, the verdict certifies the expedited version of the value based on the material identified in accordance with section 25 of the Customs Act 1969, the importer's request to a particular person Should not be cut along. If this is done to maintain liability, they should spend time with creative claims, mechanical reviews, and legal deadlines.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
