AMIR SADIQ versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE
Sections 33 (5) (13), 37A and 37B (1) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition were charged with the cancellation of the petitioner / accused of the FIR, which has received billions of rupees. Committed fraud, which caused huge damage to the state exchequer. During the court proceedings, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Tribunal and the Tribunal, under his order, obtained the remand of the case without clearing the show cause notice and canceling the infringement report and violated the presence of the showcase notice. The report confirmed that it was the responsibility of the applicant because of the commission. Tax fraud survives can proceed with criminal proceedings FIR cannot be terminated, firstly because the accused / applicant had alternative treatment under CRPC ie his innocence. Was to appear before the Investigating Officer. And there were other remedies available to the accused who claimed to be innocent and who could get relief without going through the entire length of the trial to dismiss the constitutional request.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
