MALIK AHMAD BAKHSH versus TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, ARIFWALA
Sections 176 and 177 of the Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Sections 58, 59 and 60 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 2 (A) (B) (C), 4 and 199 of the Registration Request for Sales Revenue Certified The duplicate applicant's complaint was that the Revenue Authorities refused to issue a certified copy of the revenue record under the sale, as a result the sub-registrar refused to register to carry out the sale. Authorities raised that a certified copy of the Revenue Record was denied in the wake of illegal construction by the Ghost Societies. Under the Western Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, any officer exercising powers was not authorized to disregard the provisions of Sections 176 and 177 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 and any order which was illegal The letter was issued by the authorities directing. It was illegal for the Revenue authorities not to issue copies and it was a violation of the law and was declared by the constitution to be the highest law and ordered that all state officials work under the parameters set by law. Was, thus, any direction or order was imposed otherwise and the violation was illegal, the High Court took notice of the fact that it was the cry of the common people that the Revenue Officers refused to issue certiorari. Are doing Copies of land records directed the High Court to initiate remedial measures and if any such complaint was brought to the top officers in the Revenue Rankings, they should ensure that illegal persons
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Thatta lawyer