KHURSHID AHMAD versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-IV), BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 10 West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XI of 1957), Article 199 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional grant of proprietary rights to retain review petition, jurisdiction of the Revenue Courts clearly failed the case. And concluded that even on the order of the Deputy Commissioner, on which the applicant relied, the applicant denied the proprietary rights of the Deputy Commissioner and the appeal was dismissed before it was dismissed. The review and review filed by the Board of Revenue was also rejected by the West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act. A valid review application was also dismissed under Section 8 of the Act. , 1957, was only capable of bringing any new and important case or evidence to the record, which, despite practicing diligently, was not in the knowledge of the party at the time of the order's approval or in the event of an error. Was. Appears on the face of the record Venue authorities have failed to identify any illegal or legal error in the orders approved by the applicant and they failed to establish their case through any evidence. My oral constitutional claim cannot be construed as interference with constitutional jurisdiction; the High Court refused to interfere with the order passed by the authorities. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
