Find a Lawyer

RAJA ASHFAQ SARWAR versus SHAHID ORAKZAI

Article 52, 62 and 60 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Order, which was passed by the Election Tribunal, in view of the Speaking Order Election, without adhering to the principles of law and procedure. The Tribunal was not, without realizing that the parties' valuable rights could not be decided in a timely manner, the candidate's appeal was accepted, the Tribunal relied only on its oral statement without documentary evidence, without any order / decision. The most important part was, it should be the speakers, which contain the decision-making statements, which were missing in the unadulterated order, hopefully The defendant acknowledged that the required work fee was not deposited by the office. As a result, no notice was issued to the other party (applicants) to appear before the tribunal and defend their case tribunal, violating the principles of natural justice, by private competing defendants or supporters. Decided to pass an uncontested order without issuing a notice in the name of Pharma Respondents or Advocate General, as required under Section 60, Representative People Act 1976, itself shows that none of the respondents Under the law, no action was taken against the former parties, who made serious allegations against the narrator. Were imposed. Prior to the tribunal, his contempt of court offense was heard by the Supreme Court, but the fact was not examined by the tribunal nor the respondents were asked to present any such document to the tribunal. At least it should have asked the Advocate General to assist on this topic law websites from Mangi lawyer