Find a Lawyer

WAQAR ALI versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER

Section 49 (4) (e) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, regulated unfair practice by the employment petitioner, who claimed to be a permanent employee of the respondent and was a trade unionist. It was alleged that he was graded from Grade VI to Grade VI by being involved in a controversial case. Petitioner further alleged that he was being targeted for the second time on the same subject as he had already been sentenced for his downfall, only because his trade union activities were not a matter of accuracy. It was neither fair labor practice nor double-risk management / respondents, in the case of the embezzlement that was subsequently instituted against the applicant, he had taken his stand softly and Yet he was only punished in the case of degradation. In the case of his dismissal, the recommendation for a rigorous sentence, which was shown by the administration's very suggestion that employers were not inclined, should target the applicant, but he wanted to deal with his case reasonably and According to the law, the second charge sheet against the applicant was not on the same charges, but was related to various medical bills alleged to have been forged, saying that there could be no preventing the inquiry from being stopped. Allegations Since this was in the control of the owners, it was not necessary to go into oral evidence as it would unnecessarily prolong the litigation that was not in the interest of a body commission. Optional under Rule 34 of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Rule 1973 immigration advocates contact from Abdul Hakim lawyer