ALL PAKISTAN OPF EMPLOYEES UNION THROUGH GENERAL SECRETARY versus OVERSEAS PAKISTANIS FOUNDATION THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR
Sections 33, 44, 46, (49 ()) (e) and (50 ()) (a) (b) Jurisdiction of the National Industrial Relations Commission, section (50 ()) (a) ) As a Labor Court. In the absence of allegations of unfair labor practice in the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002, the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Relations Commission was limited to cases of unfair labor. And to enforce individual grievances in relation to any guarantees or any rights reserved to any employer or worker under any law or any award or settlement, or to redress individual grievances, Will not have jurisdiction. As stated in section 46 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002. But the issue of unfair labor matters only in the manner set out in section 46 (33) (e) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002, section 49 (4) (e) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002 Will do The Labor Court was granted powers to the National Industrial Relations Commission in relation to the unfair practice of non-industrial relations and not to the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Relations Commission, in the circumstances, for the purpose of section 46 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002. Will not step in the shoes of The court, established under section 44 of the Ordinance Petition under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, did not charge any unfair labor practice in the matter of the employer because under the circumstances the National Industrial Relations Commission under the union Does not fall within the jurisdiction of the application. Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002 excluded due to non-availability of Commission jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Sidhnoti lawyer