Find a Lawyer

KHALIQUE AHMED versus JOHN & PHILLIPS (PAKISTAN) LTD.

Section 49 (4) (e) National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (C) Applicants with unfair labor interim order, who claim to be employees of the Establishment. What was required was a petition filed by the Establishment under section 49 (4) (e) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 against illegal labor practices. Filed an application, which was accepted and the establishment was dismissed, terminated or barred from taking any action against the applicant. Negative proceedings also raised the initial legal objection that there was no working relationship between the applicants and the establishment, as such applicants had no concrete position to file a petition against it and further claimed that the petition The contractors were engaged and employed by the contractor, who removed the applicants from the service who claimed to have been employed as a permission establishment since the last 2-5 years, the specified date of appointment in the application. Failed to mention nor the letter of appointment Neither document was submitted with the Establishment for its alleged appointment, so as to substantiate their claim. Applicants employed by him Petitioners also failed to produce credible evidence to prove the allegations against the Establishment The applicants did not have a case of unfair labor practice and the other two essential elements namely convenience / divorce advocates from Padidan lawyer