Find a Lawyer

AL-NOOR SUGAR MILLS LIMITED THROUGH MANAGER (LEGAL) versus MEHNATKASH LABOUR UNION

Section 49 (4) (e) National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) unfair practice interim relief by employees, employer's grant alleges in special terms application It was reported that employees and other members of the union held a gate meeting, in which threatening remarks were issued against the employer's general manager that he could be shot and anti-management slogans were raised by the employees. Were. Seasoned workers, otherwise, have extended threats to hiring local landlords in the area to pressure the employer to approve their demands. Employees made no specific denial of allegations of physical threats to the general manager of the employer and, by holding gate meetings, raising ants, pressure was placed on the management to force the employer to accept the demands or to force them. Is. I chanted slogans, etc. Employees and union members have adopted the pressure, coercion, intimidation and intimidation practices adopted to comply with their demands under Section 64 (1) (d) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, which is an unfair, labor-intensive process. Was. Exercising by the trade union of the workers or its members or officials here also ended the illegal strike and work by the employees, without any strike to the National Industrial Relations Commission, with jurisdiction under Rule 32 (2). The investment was made. c) The Industrial Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Functions) Rule 1973 exists to prevent the commission detained in unfair labor practice that incites and provokes employees and workers. list of supreme court advocates from Kahror Pacca lawyer