Find a Lawyer

SME BANK LTD. STAFF UNION versus SME BANK LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR

Sections 33, 46, 49 (4) (e) and 50 (3) (a) (b) of the Industrial Relations Commission requesting by the jurisdiction of the collective bargaining agent union of the National Industrial Relations Commission scope petition 33. The Collective Bargaining Union, which claimed that the administration, which allows its employees to increase annually in the month of January each year, extended, but withheld, an annual increment for the year 2003, 2004, 2006 That the increase in 2005 increased its claim that the annual increase is a guaranteed and protected right for employees under the law, and that denial is a violation of the law. The petition was resisted merely because the applicant did not have any Luxury Standby to file the petition and, as such, the petition could not be retained as a collective. A bargaining agent cannot enforce a specific right in a labor, and if a collective bargaining agent cannot enforce the right of an individual worker for that reason, he cannot do it for you. Under section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 2002, the rights of multiple workers are enforced. The management adviser said it was wrong that the annual increment grant was given by law and that collective bargaining agents could not clarify the cause of the workers. And was unable to maintain this request under section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002, in this regard, because the administration, because of no element of unfair labor practices by the National Industrial Relations Commission, determined this request. Had no jurisdiction to do so ask a advocate free from Kohat lawyer