Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus STATE

Section 497 (5) of the Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 of the bail, entered into depth in relation to Albee's plea in depth to the facts and documentary evidence while granting bail to the accused in the application for the trial court. Was done Not without a doubt, but given the principle that once a bail is approved, certain conditions will be required for its cancellation to be set up to withdraw the bail-out exemption, as fulfilled in the case. Had not happened, merely claiming that the accused was intimidating to the complainant and his family, was not enough as it was not confirmed as the bail was already given to the co-accused, despite the fact It cannot be denied that there were strong reasons for his detention in the fact that he was merely attributed to the role of murder order. For the accused, who could otherwise be considered for exemption in bail, it could be denied, however, that he had no reason to remain in the commanding position, or that the assassination of the deceased motive, the participant Staying hidden in the mind of the accused will not justify proceeding with the life of an innocent person No reason to interfere with the defamation order, whereby the bail is granted to the co-accused. To predict, especially when the trial began, could not be predicted because the trial could be reached early. Should maintain the current position. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kamber Ali Khan lawyer