Find a Lawyer

MAJ. RIFAT NAWAZ versus MST. TAHIRA

The suit for division partition for the division of the 2 house was simultaneously decided by the trial court and the appellate court, the defendant affirming that in a joint investigation before the defendant's High Court Playa. It was said that the house in question was that of his father and he was not given house to the plaintiff, he was not entitled to the decree by partition. The question involved in this matter was whether a father was on the occasion of his son's marriage. Can give Dwyer in favor of his daughter-in-law, whom his father kept. This law allows for immovable and immovable property on the occasion of the marriage of her son, especially when the bridegroom made the condition that the house be completely submerged in the premises of the said house. Was impressed by the thumb. The father of the defendant hearing the evidence was fully proved in the record of the case, the following two courts appreciated the evidence on the record and after that Anang passed the judgment in favor of the plaintiff that any misunderstanding Or adherence to the trial court's decisions and orders for not reading the evidence, as well as adherence to the Appellate Court's evidence set forth below, was strictly adhered to, which called for interference. \ R \ n immigration advocates contact from Gambet lawyer