MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus ABDUL GHAFOOR
The Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, section 28, the pre-emptor Ampling of the Royal Pre-emptor, which had been applied as a pre-emptor M suit by the defendant, was rejected, but was nevertheless premature. Despite being allowed to deposit money, he failed to deposit the same amount, which led to his case. Exit O: Under the injunction, the competing pre-emptor became an unnecessary party and the interest filed by the vendor against the decree passed in favor of the original pre-emptor was reduced to zero appellate court. The error in holding the hat rival pre-emptor was still a necessary party in the appeal and in its absence, the appeal was disqualified.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Mailsi lawyer
