Disappeared persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 Section 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Article 199 By the officers of the Settlement, the petitioner's predecessor, who was not in compliance with the High Court order, was allotted a part of the house which was not in his possession. Was occupied while the house was allotted to him. The constitutional petition against the Settlement Authorities of the petitioner for the other claimants was accepted with the instruction that the Settlement Commissioner himself determine the dates on which the relevant claimants decided the matter rather than decide it. Instead of presenting himself to the deputy. The Settlement Commissioner, which passed judgment on the applicants of the case, was that the Deputy Settlement Commissioner and the Settlement Commissioner were obliged to reject the orders which violated the High Court's remand. The order of the High Court was set aside because the position was correct. The Settlement Authorities, which are in violation of the High Court's remand order, were instructed by the Settlement Commissioner to determine the dates of possession of all the claimants and to move the house in accordance with the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
