MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894, a year before the publication of the notification under Section 4 of the Act, the Collector of the Land Compensation, refused to take up the sale prices of certain parcels of the land simply because it inflated them and Worked extraordinarily well. On average, the property entering the sale of his choice is well positioned and in good standing and neither the collector nor the civil court persuaded him to deal with the evidence which gave him a fair market value. Was presented to be agreed upon. Land and he did not bother to discuss and appreciate the evidence previously included by the appellants. The appellants also included the sale of land held on record copies of eleven variations which were brought in by registered sale deed, keeping in view the market value and sale during the one year, potentially increasing the value of the land dispute. Despite the concessions, it is possible to obtain higher prices, the appellant was not allowed during the year of E, a change in the sales entered one year ago to ascertain the value of the land acquired Can provide good quality thus the collector's compensation was increased and accordingly The order was passed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Goular Khel lawyer