Find a Lawyer

GHULAM QASIM versus INAYAT ULLAH ALIAS TULLU

Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), the cancellation of Section 365 A / 109 bail, was a bail plea for a restraining order granting bail to the defendant / accused under which the accused was granted bail by the lower court. And is being taken care of. The High Court, on the principle of consistency, charged equally for the alleged crime, was entitled to arbitrary relief from bail The available facts and circumstances suggest that the accused's case is subject to further investigation, guaranteed by improper order. No, the High Court Lower Court exercised its discretion properly and according to the principles of justice, there was a need for strong and extraordinary grounds for the cancellation of bail, which are present in the present case, in which the principles of the cancellation rule Were different. Bail Section 497 (5), CCP did not order the court to revoke the bail even if there was a crime or a conviction. Or life and even if the grant of bail was banned under section 497 (1), the CCP's preemption was left to the court under section 497 (5), CCP, Which was in compliance with the principles of the Periodical Materials, which were enforced in keeping with the orders. give bail criminal advocate from Dhirkot lawyer