THE STATE THROUGH DIRECTOR A.N.F., PESHAWAR versus ABDUL QADEER PARACHA
Evidence after trial of section 1 561A Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (c), 33 and 46 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Order After recording, the trial court, on record, concluded that the applicant had proved himself the owner of the car in question. And it was leased to the accused. And he had no knowledge of the smuggling of illegal business in the aforementioned case and the trial court properly authorized him to be in custody. No competing claimant was exposed and the fact was that it had nothing to do with the owner. The commission of the crime, which he had the right to hold in the trial court's car order, was absolutely accurate, just and strictly in accordance with the law, which demanded no interference and the cancellation. Was not responsible.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Lower Dir lawyer
