DISTRICT POPULATION WELFARE OFFICER, DERA ISMAIL KHAN versus STATE
Section 522A Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 404/34 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement of Hoodwood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (4) Seizure of Stolen Money Request for Return of Trial Property Veterans have committed a crime. Theft and murder were convicted and sentenced, and the money recovered from the accused was confiscated in favor of the state and the trial court refused to return the applicant, who was an officer of that office. The fact where the accused had stolen the money was the fact that the theft was committed in the applicant's office; since the case was the salary of the members of the staff of the applicant's office, the trial court's impartial order under which to refund Was denied, the trial court was not called sustainable, set aside and confiscated money was ordered The petitioner should be returned
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Kharian lawyer
