Find a Lawyer

ALI ZAR versus SHAH KHALID

Section 2 302 / un34 law declares death in appreciation of the evidence (Article 198446 1984 1984), Article evidence46 The necessary prosecution case, mainly on the declaration of the deceased's death and the general statement of the case, let the prosecution Witnesses testified that when the statement of the victim he was injured, in the form of an FIR, no doubt can be treated as a dying declaration, which, by itself, was a legal testimony of 1984. Article 46 was good enough to sustain the sentence on a capital charge (deadly wounded) taken to the hospital 3 hours after the incident in critical condition. In these circumstances, it was the responsibility of the police officer to obtain a certificate from the doctor before recording the injured statement that he was in good standing to make such statement, and no such reasoning was obtained Could not find explanation. The concerned police officer, who gave the victim's fitness statement, remained suspicious, in which case two of the prosecution's witnesses did not fully support the prosecution's case because their evidence faced clear contradictions, which led to the death. Negatives on the authenticity / truth of the The site's plan to identify and identify the prosecution's testimony by the investigating officer was also in support of the dying declaration, though the allegation was felonious for almost 3 years but said only the fugitive was the real evidence. The alternative cannot be taken as a piece of evidence only when there is assurance and good. That is, the overwhelming evidence that led to the prosecution, which was lacking in the case and the trial court under trial by trial. Source suspects tax advocates from Shadiwal lawyer