Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAH DIYAZ KHAN versus STATE


Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 bail, amounted to 500 grams of the quantity of marijuana allegedly recovered from the accused, which was punished by the prohibition clause of Control Section 9 of the Drug Substances Act, 1997 Did not come under Most of them sentenced to seven years, but the mere production of two FI rupees against the accused will not exclude him from guaranteeing bail because his evidence was yet to be produced and the prosecution had to appoint him in the FI. That the accused had committed such a crime. Earlier, there were only allegations in the FI that could not yet reach its logical end. The accused entered bail in the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Bannu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.