DERA CABLE NETWORK LTD. THROUGH, CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY (PEMRA) THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Section 30A [As amended by Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Amendment) Act (II of 2007]] Appeal for permission to install cable network Disappearance of Appeal Principles of Natural Justice, Appellant's violation petitioned Authority Which is supported by two demands. The draft authority's issuance letter, in a brief order letter to the appellants, informed them that there were already four cable networks working, there was no scope for further license issuance and the appellants An invalid order was passed in the back of. They were given no notice of the impact, those who had the right to a hearing were denied their right to be denied, especially in cases when they received a hearing notice. Was issued not just the judiciary. Action, but even in administrative proceedings, the applicant or the appellant, as the case may be, was always entitled to notice or opportunity, even at the hearing, in the pending tribunal in the Administrative Tribunals or the Kosi Judicial Tribunals. It was compulsory that was derived from natural justice because no body could be condemned. The cruel order revealed that he was responsible for the gross, un-speaking and violating the law and the impeachment order. The matter was set aside and the matter was registered under the Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002. After giving this opportunity to the suspected tribunal, the law was strictly sent to re-judge the decision. Telling Appeals \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
