Find a Lawyer

PAK PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. versus SYED HAMID ALI

Section 73 Trial for breach of contract. The details of the plaintiff's claim, defense and absence of evidence in the rebellion, loss of prior evidence and missing evidence in the affidavit in the documentary evidence are not settled solely on the basis of the usual claims. The amount of damages cannot be provided solely by the evidence without real damages. Claiming the party was legally obliged to do the litigation first, and then to present sufficient, factual and positive evidence in its evidence, which, despite the absence of defense, was a heavy burden on the plaintiff to prove damages. The plaintiff failed to exclude such burden of circumstances r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• MUHAMMAD USMAN v. MUHAMMAD NASEEM 2014 CLC 506
• JAVED HUSSAIN LANGAH v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 507
• ASHIQUE HUSSAIN v. State 2014 MLD 509
• PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Environmental Protection 2014 PLD 511
• Mst. SHAMSHAD BIBI v. The S.S.P. 2014 MLD 519
• MUNAWAR SHAH v. State 2014 YLR 523
• SHAKEEL AHMED v. Mst. KAUSAR PARVEEN 2014 CLC 524
• TARIQ NAZIR BUKHARI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Home Secretary 2014 MLD 524

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Daur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes