THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL, N. -W . F. P. versus GHULAM NABI
Sections 9 (c) and 48 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 419, 420, 468 and 471 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Section 417 of the Appeal Appeals against a bad accused Against being evil, there was a double idea of innocence in his favor, as long as every accused would be considered innocent until he was found guilty. And the other, which was not criminalized by the competent court law, as a rule, once the guilty plea of the guilty was established at trial in the court of law and acquitted of the charge, So there will be a very strong and extraordinary foundation. Required to interfere with the same accused, in the present case, was not arrested on the spot, but was later arrested, a 30 bore pistol was recovered from the accused, a separate challan from a competent court. I should have presented because it was not included in the current case. After trial of the accused under section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, no test identification parade was made so that no intoxicant was recovered from the physical possession of the accused. In his judicial statement, the accused acquitted the accused by saying that he did not go with him, the accused was neither his owner nor his provider nor suspected of involvement of the accused in the case. There were no unusual terms at the end of the prosecution, and the trial court had shown a fair evaluation of the evidence for reasons given to acquit the accused and this did not happen.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
