Find a Lawyer

DAWAR KHAN versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Sections 17 (d) and 18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition requested a court applicant to transfer two references pending two cases pending in both these courts, in which an allegation and a trial hearing. The directive must be transferred. All the offenses, together with the petitioner, claimed that both the cases were of the same nature and allegedly committed at the same time, two of the applicant's cases were illegal. False and in violation of Section 17 (d) of the National Accountability Ordinance, the applicant's valid trial was underway; both references had all the evidence completed and the investigation officer's investigation still pending on the charge sheet. Copies were available. In the first reference, the applicant was specifically charged with fraud and misconduct amounting to Rs. 54,24,809, while in the second reference he was charged with illicit use of Rs. 4,84,328, However, a joint trial in this case was also resolved in a court to justify the transfer of references. Section 17 (d) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 was permissible and not mandatory, however, so as to facilitate the parties and avoid conflicting decisions, when the majority of witnesses in both references were common, it was appropriate to move the reference pending. Was. The second accountability court in the second accountability court jobs for fresh advocates from Khyber Agency lawyer