Find a Lawyer

SHAMA KHEL versus YOUSAF ALI KHAN

Sections 497 and 103 of the Explosives Act (VI of 1908), Section 5 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 bail, Section HA grant raided the house of the accused in the police party company and Heavy weapons and ammunition allegedly recovered. All members of the family have different types and abilities than the homeless, and the investigating officer could not record the statement of any person who stated that the articles were investigated by the Investigation Officer despite information related to the detective. He owned and owned articles, was raided. Without compiling and retrieving two or more respected residents of the area, the list of articles signed by him was not prepared, and Section 103 of the search witnesses, CRPC, was investigated by the investigating officer. Was completely violated while the search and the search was in progress. The accused persons were neither ex-offenders nor strongly reported in the alleged retrieval of articles. The culprits remained in police custody, but nothing was collected to believe that they were involved in anti-social or destructive activities. Were involved. The offense for which the accused was booked did not fall under the section 497, CRPC prohibition clause, and thus the grant of bail. There was a rule in this case and the exception was denied, preventing anyone with extraordinary ground privileges from being granted bail; when they were out, they were ordered to be released on bail. \ r \ n \ r \ n property advocates from Jhand lawyer