NOOR JAMAL versus THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL, N.-W.F.P.
Sections 86A and 561, a mechanism that ordered the abolition of section 86A, CrSpop, applied for a procedure to take possession of the tribal area; Who had accused the applicant of abduction and detention. The son presented two witnesses to the complainant who had been sent to the tribal area where he allegedly detained the complainant's son by the alleged applicant, who had examined himself and was guilty of his innocence on oath. Testified that he had requested the two officers with records to summon the court as their defense witness, but in this regard the petitioner's request was rejected by the magistrate magistrate that at this stage the accused / applicant was arrested. There is no need to present any official testimony because the magistrate was not conducting a full trial and only one In relation to Section 86A, CRPC, the inquiry was being carried out in Section 86A, CRPC. For all practical purposes, a mini-trial was set up to determine the existence or absence of a first case to answer this question to determine the person against whom the political authorities were arrested in the settled area. A warrant was issued for him to be detained. Whether or not to appear before the Political Authority since the applicant was arrested from the settled area and was a permanent resident of the settled area, therefore action was required under section 86A, CRPC, section 86A, CR During the hearing of the case under the PC, the magistrate had to register with him
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
