Find a Lawyer

AHMAD DIN versus MST. GUL ZEBA

Section 114 and O XLVII, R 1, the scope of the review application was completely dismissed by the appellant and the review application was submitted and arguments were made in support of the parties' respective disputes and the case law was referenced. , Which was consistently involved in the decision, the court considered the petitioner's decision to review the petition filed, in support of the review petition against the decision passed in the review, that there was nothing available on record What new material has emerged to warrant filing a review application under? CPC Review Be able to take The discovery of new and important matter or evidence, which was not in the knowledge of any party after a sustained effort or diligence exercise, and even if it existed when the lease was all before the court and at the time of this decision, the review 'S jurisdiction will not apply to an issue if significant content or evidence has existed since Matt. The court had decided that the party would also show the court that it had never been negligent and that the new material to be discovered must be directly linked to the matter which is under consideration, if considered directly. The decision will have an impact or a revision order if there is a mistake or omission on the record of this case which could also be a revision scope. In the jurisdiction of the High Court review, no new material was brought in such a way that the review application was dismissed without merit, in the circumstances best advocate from Fizagat lawyer